Hims
0 desktop screenshots
Funnel Overview
Hims & Hers - Funnel Overview
Funnel Summary
- Total steps: ~12-15 (concern-specific landing → medical quiz → provider review → checkout)
- Funnel type: Medical qualification quiz with concern-segmented entry
- Time to complete: 5-10 minutes
- Data collected: Concern category, symptoms, medical history, date of birth, photos (for some conditions), shipping address, payment
- Payment timing: After quiz + provider review — framed as "treatment plan" purchase
- Personalization level: Heavy — quiz determines specific product/treatment recommendation
Funnel Flow
Ad (concern-specific: hair loss, ED, weight loss, skin)
→ Concern-specific landing page (forhims.com/hair-loss)
→ "Start my free visit" CTA
→ Q1: Symptom specifics (duration, severity)
→ Q2-5: Medical history (medications, allergies, conditions)
→ Q6: Date of birth (medical verification)
→ Q7-8: Lifestyle questions (relevant to condition)
→ Photo upload (for skin/hair conditions)
→ "Reviewing your answers..." loading interstitial
→ "Good news — you're eligible for treatment!" (qualification reveal)
→ Treatment plan recommendation (product + price)
→ Account creation (email, password)
→ Shipping + payment
→ Provider review (async — licensed physician reviews before shipping)
Key Design Elements
Concern-Segmented Entry
Each ad links to a concern-specific landing page:
/hair-loss— hair regrowth treatment/erectile-dysfunction— ED medication/mental-health— anxiety/depression treatment/weight-loss— GLP-1 medication
This segmentation ensures the entire funnel from ad to checkout speaks to ONE specific concern. The user never has to self-identify their issue from a generic page.
Qualification Framing
The core psychological reframe: instead of "Buy our product," Hims says "Are you eligible for treatment?" This inverts the power dynamic:
- User is seeking qualification, not being sold to
- Product feels medical and exclusive, not commercial
- Completing the quiz feels like earning access, not filling out a form
Provider Review
A licensed physician reviews quiz answers before treatment ships. This happens asynchronously (user doesn't wait), but the presence of the review creates massive trust: this isn't a supplement company, it's a medical service.
What Works Well
1. Qualification Creates Desire
"See if you qualify" / "Are you eligible?" makes the product feel scarce and medical. Users who "pass" feel validated. Users who are considering abandoning face the fear of not knowing if they qualify — curiosity drives completion.
2. Progress Bar Through Medical Assessment
A clear progress indicator shows how far through the assessment the user has progressed. This creates goal gradient momentum — users accelerate as they near "eligibility results."
3. "Good News" Reveal
The transition from quiz to recommendation uses a positive reveal: "Good news — you're eligible for treatment!" This creates a dopamine hit of positive validation. The user feels they've earned something, making the subsequent price feel like a fair exchange rather than a purchase.
4. FDA-Approved Product Framing
Treatment recommendations reference FDA-approved medications (finasteride, sildenafil, etc.). This authority signal makes the recommendation feel clinical rather than commercial. Trust in the recommendation transfers to trust in the purchase.
5. Instant Name Personalization
After providing their name, subsequent screens address the user by name: "Michael, based on your answers..." This personalization creates intimacy and makes the medical assessment feel individualized.
6. Concern-Specific Ad-to-Funnel Consistency
~1,200 active Meta ads, each linking to concern-specific landing pages. The message match from ad → landing page → quiz → recommendation is seamless. A user who clicks a hair loss ad never sees content about ED or weight loss.
What Could Be Better
1. Photo Upload Creates Major Friction
For skin and hair conditions, Hims requests photo uploads during the quiz. This is a high-friction step that likely causes significant drop-off. Users may not have suitable photos ready or may feel uncomfortable sharing clinical photos through a website.
2. Cloudflare Blocking May Indicate Bot Concerns
Hims blocks automated browsers with Cloudflare (403 errors). While this is a security measure, overly aggressive bot detection can also block legitimate users on VPNs or corporate networks.
3. Price Reveal After Emotional Investment
Users invest 5-10 minutes in a medical assessment before seeing prices. For price-sensitive users, this can feel like a bait-and-switch if the treatment plan is expensive ($85-200+/month). Showing price ranges earlier would set expectations.
4. Limited Navigation/Exit Options
During the quiz flow, navigation is minimal — no menu, no "learn more" links. While this reduces distraction, it also traps users who want to research more before committing. A sidebar with FAQs would serve both conversion and trust.
Key Psychological Principles Used
| Principle | Where It Appears |
|---|---|
| Qualification/Scarcity | "Are you eligible?" framing makes the product feel exclusive |
| Authority | FDA-approved medications, licensed physician review, medical language |
| Commitment & Consistency | Medical quiz creates investment in the treatment outcome |
| Personalization Effect | Name personalization, concern-specific flow |
| Positive Validation | "Good news — you're eligible!" creates dopamine reward |
| Social Proof | Doctor endorsements (Dr. Yoram Harth), influencer ads |
| Sunk Cost | 5-10 minutes of medical history before price reveal |
| Loss Aversion | "You qualify for treatment" — not purchasing means losing access |
| Goal Gradient | Progress bar through assessment accelerates completion |
| Message Match | Ad → landing page → quiz all aligned to single concern |
Relevance to Twofold
High-Value Tactics to Adopt
-
Qualification framing (adapted): Instead of "Sign up for free trial," try "Check if Twofold supports your specialty." This creates the same qualification dynamic without the medical exclusivity. Users who "qualify" (Twofold supports their specialty) feel validated.
-
"Good news" reveal moment: After a short quiz, show "Great news — Twofold has templates specifically designed for [specialty]! Here's your personalized setup:" This creates the same positive validation moment Hims uses after their medical quiz.
-
Concern-segmented entry: Create landing pages for different clinician pain points:
/burnout,/compliance,/documentation-time. Each page has tailored copy, testimonials from relevant specialties, and a quiz that speaks to that specific concern. -
Name personalization: After collecting the clinician's name (first onboarding question), use it throughout: "Dr. [Name], based on your practice type..." This transforms a generic product experience into a personalized consultation.
Lower-Priority Tactics
-
Provider/authority review: Hims uses physician review for trust. Twofold could use "clinical review" of AI-generated notes as a trust mechanism: "Our clinical team reviews note templates for accuracy."
-
FDA-approved language: Twofold can't use FDA framing, but "HIPAA-compliant" and "BAA available" serve the same authority function for clinical audiences.